Flexible land rental agreements

One way to share the risk and rewards between the operator (renter) and landlord is to enter into a flexible land rental agreement. Iowa State Extension reported that nearly 12 percent of all cash leases were flexible in 2008.

Advantages of flexible leases 

  • The actual rent paid adjusts automatically as yields and or prices fluctuate as determined by agreement.
  • The yield and price risks are shared between the landlord and the tenant.
  • Owners are paid in cash so they do not have to be involved in the cropping management decisions.
  • If the agreement includes base cash rent agreement with a bonus, FSA will consider the lease a cash rental agreement; therefore, all government payments would go to the tenant and not have to be divided.

Different types of flexible rental agreements

Most flexible rental agreements have a base rent component that assures the landlord this income and will allow the tenants to cover expenses even after a bad year with good crop insurance coverage. Base rents vary by area but for Southern Minnesota the range for base rents could be from $100 to $200. Then a flexible component is added, either based on price, yields, gross revenue or some combination of these components.

There are many ways to set up a flexible land rental agreement. The farmer and landlord should determine what both are looking for. The higher the base rent the more risk the farmer has, the lower the base rent the landlord is increasing their share of the risk with no crop insurance to protect their revenue.

Flexible rents based on gross revenue

This is a rental agreement where rental payments are based on gross revenue of the farmland. It can include a base payment in the crop year and a final payment after the actual yield and price are determined.

Base rents plus a bonus

This is a rental agreement where a base rent is paid and then a bonus may or may not be paid determined if yields exceed a base goal. Then these additional bushels would be shared between landlord and tenant. The bonus can also be determined by yield and price together or price alone as well.

Flexible rent based on yield only

This is a rental agreement where the landlord receives a set base number of bushels with additional bushels if yields are higher than was determined for the base payment. This can also be done with a cash payment based on yield and then price at an elevator.

Flexible rent based on price only 

This is a rental agreement where the rental payment is based on crop prices. Often it is an average price of the previous twelve months or a quarterly price which is multiplied times the bushels agreed to.
Rental payments can be made at the quarterly price setting times or half and half or after harvest.

Profit sharing flexible rent agreements

This is a rental agreement where the landlord and the tenant share the profit from the farmland. This agreement is similar to a 50-50 crop share lease where they share crop yields 50% to landlord and 50% to the tenant and some of the expenses are paid by each party.

What have the Minnesota cash rents been compared to percentage of gross revenue?

Average southern Minnesota cash rent as a percentage of gross revenue

Year Average cash rent paid per acre in Southern Minnesota Average gross revenue, dollars per acre - corn Average gross revenue, dollars per acre - soybeans Average cash rent as % of gross revenue - corn Average cash rent as % of gross revenue - soybeans Corn price Soybean price
2000 98.31 $267.31 $237.56 37% 41% $1.75 $5.11
2001 97.89 $228.38 $208.52 43% 47% $1.75 $5.15
2002 101.57 $344.09 $258.52 30% 39% $2.18 $5.31
2003 103.74 $358.05 $246.81 29% 42% $2.23 $6.85
2004 105.9 $351.40 $228.30 30% 46% $2.00 $5.45
2005 110.4 $375.47 $300.10 29% 37% $2.03 $5.65
2006 114.83 $511.27 $316.05 22% 36% $2.90 $6.05
2007 125.44 $611.21 $472.76 21% 27% $3.68 $9.52
2008 146.55 $681.06 $432.32 22% 34% $3.89 $9.65
2009 158.86 $716.55 $474.32 22% 33% $3.74 $9.66
2010 168.25 $884.41 $564.02 19% 30% $4.68 $10.87
2011 169.32 $893.43 $462.95 19% 37% $5.66 $11.40
2012 199.88 $1,182.80 $693.11 17% 29% $6.50 $13.77
2013 243.47 $748.00 $593.99 33% 41% $4.45 $12.63
2014 241.36 $639.96 $476.24 38% 51% $3.93 $10.15
2015 231.92 $723.29 $514.71 32% 45% $3.52 $8.60
2016 226.85 $683.96 $575.14 33% 39% $3.34 $9.39
10 year average 26% 37%

Farmland rental rates increased dramatically the last few years as commodity prices reached record levels, and they remain high compared to historic averages. But grain prices will go lower again and rental rates often lag and do not decline as rapidly. This will leave farmers with high rental rates locked in that will create a loss for the year.

  • The table above shows corn cash rental rates were an average of 26 percent of gross corn revenue from 2007 through 2016 crop years. With soybeans, the average was 37 percent of gross soybean revenue for the same 10 years.
  • The previous three years the percentages were much lower this was due to higher prices and higher gross revenue amounts, and this adjusted higher in 2013.
  • The last two columns in the table show the average price farmers received in Southern Minnesota for the crop sold that year. When corn prices are above $2.50, the cash rent as percent of gross fall below 30 percent to an average of 21 percent of gross for 2006, 2007, 2008 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
  • In 2013 cash rent increased significantly by $44 per acre and the percent of gross increased accordingly.
  • When soybeans prices are above $9.50, such as in 2007 through 2012, the cash rent as a percent of gross decline to 31 percent from the 37 percent of gross average from 1994 to 2013. Higher rental rates caused this percent to increase to 41 percent in 2013 for soybeans.

 

David Bau, Extension educator

Reviewed in 2017

Share this page:

© 2018 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.